How do you write women so well?
Spock breaks the evil robots by dropping a logic bomb on them.
Irrational women and beta-males have similar characteristics, brains are wired similarly, their ability to reason and use logic, similar. This is why you won’t see either winning at chess. Since I can’t talk about irrational women, (as a protected class,) I’d like to talk about beta-males, like estrogen-laced Joe Scarborough:
A sensitive man.
Note: I did not call Joe Scarborough a faggot, you connected those pink dots yourself. Anyway…
A couple of days ago Donald Trump said this:
Beta-males in our media went nuts. But, this blog post isn’t going to just rag on beta-males like Joe Scarborough, nor talk about the efficiency of our reptilian brains VS higher-order brains in life and death situations, no.
Today, I want to talk a little bit about logic, reason, the english language, telling the truth, theorizing, predicting the future, humor, and perhaps a few other things…
a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.
Was Donald Trump’s second amendment statement a threat?
HMMM. No. By definition it was not a threat.
Was Donald Trump’s second amendment statement a prediction?
a statement made about the future.
No. The word “prediction” doesn’t cut it either.
Luckily I’m good at math; luckily I’ve studied computer science; I recognized exactly what Donald Trump’s statement was.
People who think logically will usually have a background that includes at least some math training, others, whose brains are wired “differently” tend to avoid math:
Beta-male Scarborough can’t handle fourth-grade fractions.
Hillary will let her man handle the tricky math. Bill will fix the economy, she’ll make him a sandwich.
Sorry, I got sidetracked.
The first thing I notice in Donald Trump’s speech is an obvious IF/THEN construct. Not a threat; not a prediction; a conditional statement.
conditional or IF/THEN statement:
A conditional statement, symbolized by p q, is an if–then statement in which p is a hypothesis and q is a conclusion.
IF **CONDITION** THEN **RESULT** is a basic construct in geometry, logic, and boolean math.
Here’s how computer scientists, electrical engineers etc… view the: IF **CONDITION** THEN **RESULT**
**CONDITION 1** Hillary Clinton becomes president.
**CONDITION 2** Hillary Clinton attempts to end the second amendment, (a right guaranteed by our Constitution.)
(NOTE: BOTH CONDITIONS MUST BE TRUE)
**RESULT** Second Amendment people, (armed and angry,) might do something. THAT WILL BE A HORRIBLE DAY.
What do you think of Donald Trump’s conditional statement? Donald Trump’s hypothesis? Is it a valid hypothesis? Does it ring true?
Before you answer; watch this video:
Richard Yeager Pack Your Bags
So what do you think?
Is Donald Trump’s IF/THEN conditional statement a valid, honest, hypothesis?
Not: is Trump right or wrong;
not: are people who feel this way right or wrong-
Is it possible some “2nd amendment people” might cause problems if Hillary Clinton tried to abolish the 2nd amendment?
YES. It’s possible. If you don’t see this as a possibility, you’re a fool.
IF crafting a conditional statement ever becomes a crime,
THEN Joe Scarborough will die a horrible death at the hands of a gang of rabid, rubber-dildo-wielding, naked-and-horny-retarded savages.