Humayun Kahn Was a Traitor…

“Here it Comes”

The Kahn man, (con-man), and his female slave take the stage at DNC.

Aisha (Muhammad’s 6-year-old wife) said [to Muhammad]: ‘You have made us equal to the dogs and the asses’

Islam is an enslaver of women, the blue hijab she wears silently: a symbol of women’s subservient status.

Jihad

Koran (8:39)- “And fight with them (UNBELIEVERS) until there are no more fitnah (UNBELIEVERS) and religion is all (GLOBAL CONQUEST) for Allah”

Muslims are commanded by their god to kill non-muslims and conquer the entire Earth, once you understand this as a fact, you understand Donald Trump’s muslim ban not as “extreme,” or “unconstitutional,” but as common sense. You also understand why allowing muslims into the military is foolish.

Taqiyya

Koran (2:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts”

Lying, deception, infiltration, “blending in” are a part of Islam; a muslim is allowed and encouraged to deceive non-muslims; a muslim can make and break any oath, (for example,) to “protect and defend the Constitution,” as long as the muslim is working towards the ultimate goal: (Jihad: Holy war/global conquest.)

These two key principles: (Jihad and Taqiyya) are important concepts for non-muslims to understand, as it helps to explain surface contradictions in muslim behavior.

“It will not stop ever”

---

“Good” muslims.

Oath of enlistment:

“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).”

As I established above: a “good” muslim a “faithful” muslim should kill non-muslims whenever he has a chance, (jihad) and any oath to the contrary is meaningless. (taqiyya)

Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar- US Army

On March 23, 2003 at the beginning of the Iraq war, Sergeant Hasan threw four hand grenades into three 101st Airborne tents, then shot as many people as he could as his fellow American soldiers ran for cover. He killed a captain and a major and maimed 14 others.

Sergeant Hasan Karim Akbar was a GOOD and FAITHFUL muslim. He used Taqiyya to infiltrate our military and wage Jihad. Born: “John Kools,” he converted to Islam in prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Hasan_K._Akbar

Major Nidal Malik Hasan- US Army

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nidal_Hasan

In Fort Hood Texas, on November 5, 2009 Major Nidal Malik Hasan, shouting “Allah Akbar” (god is great!) shot 43 fellow soldiers; most of these men would have had to salute Hasan as an officer. 13 died, the rest severely injured.

Major Nidal Malik Hasan was a GOOD and FAITHFUL muslim. He used Taqiyya to infiltrate our military and wage Jihad.

---

Humayun Saqib Muazzam Khan: A Muslim Traitor?

Oath of citizenship:

“I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.”

There are two oaths Humayun Khan took in his life: an oath of U.S. citizenship and an oath of enlistment. According to Islam’s rules of taqiyya both were meaningless.

Humayun Saqib Muazzam Kahn was not born American, he was born a muslim in the UAE, he and his Pakistani parents moved to the U.S. when Khan was 2.

Khan’s father is a muslim sharia-law attorney. Looking to follow in his father’s footsteps, he joined the Army to get free law school in the year 2000. Then 9/11 happened, he was forced to go to Iraq by George W Bush and Hillary Clinton. He did NOT enlist to fight in Iraq.

While in Iraq, under America’s self-defeating, politically-correct rules of engagement: (designed to protect foreign lives at the expense of U.S. soldier lives,) he stupidly approached a suspicious, hostile vehicle and was blown up.

Is he an American hero? Unknown. If Khan is an American hero, he’s not a true muslim as the two belief systems are not compatible. Did Khan intend to die for his country? Or did he die before he could wage Jihad?

Am I saying Khan was a future terrorist? No, only the best muslims can be terrorists. I am saying though, however, to be 100% crystal clear:

If Humayun Khan was an American hero as some have called him; THEN KHAN was a traitor to his god, and his child-molesting prophet Muhamet.